<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Beets &#038; Cabbage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journalofhealthyliving.com/more-beets-cabbage.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journalofhealthyliving.com/more-beets-cabbage.htm</link>
	<description>To a healthier, richer, and more rewarding life</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sheamus</title>
		<link>http://journalofhealthyliving.com/more-beets-cabbage.htm#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalofhealthyliving.com/?p=91#comment-222</guid>
		<description>I'm always very skeptical about 'experts' making claims about things we should or should not be doing when it comes to food. It's common sense to keep your dietary fat intake under control and it's common sense to minimise your alcohol consumption.

But to tell us we should be eating swiss chard and drinking pomengranate juice? Yes, obviously, because our ancient ancestors thrived on those same foods, too! :D

However, my biggest gripe is that, as usual, this sort of advice is always very vague about the pros and cons because it has to be - it's aimed at somebody who doesn't exist: the average person. Much like protein and carbohydrate RDAs, these numbers are all just best guesses, and are typically aimed at sedentary people. If you're physically active, have a medical condition of some kind, are bigger or smaller than 'average', have certain food allergies, a bigger brain or heart, or just simply require a higher does of whatever, these recommendations often not only do not apply to you, but might actually be causing you harm.

Something like sulforaphane, for example, is also prevelant in broccoli, sprouts, watercress and salad rocket. Why not recommend those items as well/instead?

Variety is the spice of life - keep your diet mixed and, most importantly, interesting, and you'll go on to achieve great success with your health. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always very skeptical about &#8216;experts&#8217; making claims about things we should or should not be doing when it comes to food. It&#8217;s common sense to keep your dietary fat intake under control and it&#8217;s common sense to minimise your alcohol consumption.</p>
<p>But to tell us we should be eating swiss chard and drinking pomengranate juice? Yes, obviously, because our ancient ancestors thrived on those same foods, too! <img src='http://journalofhealthyliving.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>However, my biggest gripe is that, as usual, this sort of advice is always very vague about the pros and cons because it has to be - it&#8217;s aimed at somebody who doesn&#8217;t exist: the average person. Much like protein and carbohydrate RDAs, these numbers are all just best guesses, and are typically aimed at sedentary people. If you&#8217;re physically active, have a medical condition of some kind, are bigger or smaller than &#8216;average&#8217;, have certain food allergies, a bigger brain or heart, or just simply require a higher does of whatever, these recommendations often not only do not apply to you, but might actually be causing you harm.</p>
<p>Something like sulforaphane, for example, is also prevelant in broccoli, sprouts, watercress and salad rocket. Why not recommend those items as well/instead?</p>
<p>Variety is the spice of life - keep your diet mixed and, most importantly, interesting, and you&#8217;ll go on to achieve great success with your health. <img src='http://journalofhealthyliving.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
